TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI APBD YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KEPALA DAERAH DI LAMPUNG TENGAH

Authors

  • Wafi Rizqullah H Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • M Farhan Frans Putra Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Shalsabila Hellenia Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Rizki Rizaldi Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Gusti Weliyansyah Universitas Bandar Lampung

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Law Enforcement, Corruption Crimes.

Abstract

Indonesia is a country of law, which means all the legal rules that apply in it The Indonesian state must be obeyed by citizens and state administrators. However, In fact, there are still many legal rules that are violated by citizens and state officials, such as in cases of criminal acts of corruption. Corruption crimes in Indonesia is very rampant from year to year. Therefore, it is needed enforcement of the law on criminal acts of corruption in order to realize its enforcement supremacy of law, upholding justice and realizing peace in life in public. However, it is very worrying that law enforcement is a criminal act Corruption in Indonesia is classified as very weak. This can be seen from the fact that there are still many regulators or law enforcers themselves who commit criminal acts of corruption. In Indonesia, the handling of corruption cases is carried out by state law enforcement agencies, including the Indonesian National Police, the Prosecutor's Office, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Judiciary (Corruption Crime Court). This handling is carried out to protect the state budget with the aim of ensuring that the budgeted allocation of funds is not misused. The government issues legal products such as the Criminal Code (KUHP) and other laws that regulate the prevention, eradication and law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption. Eradicating corruption is said to be effective when the applicable laws and regulations succeed in making the perpetrators of corruption receive appropriate punishment and are able to be held accountable for their actions. The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach. The type of data used is secondary data and primary data. Data collection is through library research (library research) and field research. The data analysis used is qualitative juridical.

References

Cahyaningrum. 2019. Upaya Penanganan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Journal Of Social and Political Sains. Vol. 1. No. 3.

Rae, Gradios Nyoman Tio. 2020. Good Governance dan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta: Saberro Inti Persada.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Widayati. 2018 “Penegakan Hukum Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia Yang Demokratis.” Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Surakarta : Universitas Surakarta.

Yenni Wiranti dan Ridwan Arifin. 2020. “Tantangan dan Permasalahan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia”. Jurnal Kosmik Hukum. Vol. 20, No.1. Purwokerto: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.

Zainudin Hasan. 2021. Implementasi Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Penyalahgunaan Anggaran Pendahuluan dan Belanja Kampung Yang di Lakukan Oleh Mantan Kepala Kampung Menanga Jaya. Jurnal Iblam Law Review. Vol. 1 No. 3.

Zainudin Hasan. 2022. Akibat Hukum Putusan Pra Peradilan Terhadap Penetapan

Tersangka Dugaan Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Sekretariat DPRD Tulang Bawang. Jurnal Pro Justitia. Vol. 3. No. 2.

Zainudin Hasan. 2023. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bos Di Dinas Pendidikan Lampung Tengah. Jurnal Qistie. Vol. 16. No. 1.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-03

Issue

Section

Articles