IMPLEMENTASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEPOLISIAN PADA PENGAMANAN UNJUK RASA YANG MENGAKIBATKAN TINDAKAN ANARKIS DI KOTA TERNATE
Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Anarchic Actions.Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the implementation of police law enforcement in securing demonstrations that resulted in anarchic actions in the city of Ternate, and to determine what efforts and obstacles were in implementing the handling of demonstrations carried out by students that ended in anarchy. The study was conducted at the Ternate City Police. To achieve these objectives, the author used data collection techniques in the form of interviews and requested data from related parties. The research used was qualitative descriptive research, namely research conducted to obtain secondary data and materials related to research obtained from various sources. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of police law enforcement has three stages, namely persuasive, preventive and repressive. The three things that are most dominantly carried out by the police are persuasive and preventive in other words the approach in the form of negotiation, however, repressive actions can be carried out if the escalation of the protesters has led to unlawful acts. Then there are two things that hinder, namely: Internal factors, there are police officers in the field who do not understand the main duties of the police and acts of arrogance and overacting, then external factors, the protesters are out of control, the ratio of police officers is not balanced with protesters, then the community mixes with the protesters. In addition, field conditions are different from theoretical conditions, which makes it difficult to apply the principle of presumption of innocence to a demonstration that is running anarchically and the demonstrators behave brutally, making the principle of presumption of innocence difficult to apply.
References
Buku
Chazawi Adami, 2007. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Stelsel Pidana, Pidana. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Liliweri Alo, 2003. Prasangka dan Konflik, Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Arief, Barda Nawawi, 1998. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Hamidi, 2010, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, UMM Press, Malang.
Budi Rizki Husin, 2014, Studi Lembaga Penegak Hukum, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung.
Johhnny Ibrahim, 2005, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Malang Bayu. Media.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Kunarto, 1999. Merenungi Kiprah Polri menghadapi Gelora Anarkhi 2, Cipta Manunggal, Jakarta.
Reksodipuro, Mardjono, Krimonologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Ku Karangan Buku Kedua, Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Penga Hukum Lembaga Kriminologi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 1997.
Moeljatno. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. 1993Surabaya: Putra Harsa.
Kemal Pahsa Mustafa, dan kawan-kawan, 2003, Pancasila dalam Tinjauan Historis dan Filosofis Citra Karsa Mandiri, Yogyakarta.
Raharjo Satjipto, 1980. Hukum dan Masyarakat, Cetakan Terakhir, Bandung, Angkasa.
Saputra Sigit, Efektifitas Penggunaan Kekuatan Oleh Kepolisian Dalam Menangani Aksi Unjuk Rasa Yang Anarkis, Volume 3, Nomor 3, Oktober, 2018.
Siswantoro Sumarso, 2004, Penegakan Hukum Psikotropika , Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soekanto Soejono, 2002. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, PT RajaGrafindo Persada,Jakarta,
J.T. Prasetyo J.C.T. Simorangkir, Rudy T. Erwin, 2000. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kunarto. 2001. Etika Kepolisian, Jakarta: PT. Cipta Manunggal.
Kelana Momo, 1997. Hukum Kepolisian, Jakarta: PTIK.
Kunarto, Merenung Kritik POLRI, Cipta manunggal, Jakarta, 2000.
Legowo Saputro, 2015. Diskresi Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Penanganan Aksi Unjuk Rasa Dan Implikasinya.
Marlina, 2011 : Hukum Penitensier. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Alkostar Artidjo, 2004. Pengadilan HAM, Indonesia dan Peradaban. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM-UII.
Ahmad Yulianto, dan Fajar Mukti, 2010. Dualism Penelitian Hukum Normatif Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Zaidan M. Ali, 2015. Menuju Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,
Makhsun Hadi Sadikin. 2012. Implementasi Reformasi Birokrasi Polri Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Masyarakat Dalam Menangani Unjuk Rasa).
Qamar Nurul, 2016. Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Negara Hukum Demokrasi (Human Rights in Democratiche Rechtsstaat). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Pabbu Amiruddin, Rahmah dan. 2015. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
. Kansil S.T, 2002. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Soekanto Soerjono, 1982 Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta Universitas Indonesia Press.
Sutanto. 2006. Polmas Pradigma Baru. Yayasan Pengembang Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian.
Adang Anwar, & Yesmil, Krimonologi, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2013.
Jurnal
Gazali Rahman Muhammad, 2015 Unjuk Rasa Versus Menghujat dalam Jurnal Vol. 12, No. 2, Desember.
Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional. 21(2). d. Website https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-4723620/polisi-amankan 42-orang-buntut-kericuhan-usai-demo-di-magelang tanggal 22 November 2019
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.